Introduction: Islam and the Modern World

​

The modern condition is often described in terms of political volatility, technological acceleration, and cultural fragmentation. While these features are visible and consequential, they cannot themselves be deemed foundational. Indeed, they are merely outward manifestations of a more profound transformation—namely, the systematic withdrawal of the sacred as a meaningful category in the organization of life. In contrast to premodern civilizations, which were structured around a transcendent point of reference, modern societies operate largely within a closed horizon. God, where acknowledged, is relegated to the private sphere, while public life is governed by secular norms rooted in autonomy, procedural reason, and instrumental rationality.

​

This reconfiguration has not simply changed what people believe, but how they understand belief itself. Hence, religion, more specifically, is no longer treated as a mode of orientation toward ultimate truth, but as a symbolic system to be analyzed, managed, or domesticated. It is evaluated on the basis of its social utility, psychological function, or cultural familiarity. In this context, the sacred is not denied outright, but rendered optional, and ultimately subordinate to human ends. The result is not the disappearance of religion as such, but its functionalization—its assimilation into frameworks that strip it of meaning and metaphysical depth.

​

This shift has had marked effects on contemporary Islamic discourse. In attempting to assert Islam’s legitimacy in secular societies, Muslims have often inadvertently adopted categories that reflect the very worldview they seek to resist. Islam, in due course, is frequently presented as a rational proposition, a coherent legal system, or a contributor to social justice. While these portrayals may have strategic value, they also risk distorting the tradition by reducing it to what is legible within secular terms. In doing so, they marginalize the central premise of the Islamic worldview—that God is the ultimate reality, and that human life finds meaning only through submission to Him.

​

However, the consequences of this displacement are not merely theoretical. When God is no longer the organizing principle of religious life, faith becomes vulnerable to fragmentation. Theological coherence is pursued apart from spiritual depth; ritual is performed without inward transformation. Religion becomes reactive—defined by what it opposes rather than what it reveals. The believer is, in turn, left seeking moral clarity in political programs, existential meaning in identity, and spiritual fulfillment in cultural affirmation. Yet, none of these can substitute for the direct and formative presence of God at the heart of spiritual life.

​

That said, this condition cannot be remedied through apologetics, institutional reform, or cultural activism alone. These responses, while often sincere, remain embedded in the same logic that has desacralized the world. In other words, they respond to secularism from within its own terms, rather than challenging its underlying assumptions. As a result, they may succeed in defending Islam publicly, but fail to cultivate a form of life rooted in nearness to God. What is required is a deeper reorientation—a restoration of the metaphysical foundations of Islamic thought and practice.

​

Restoration, in this sense, involves reclaiming Islam not simply as a system of doctrines or laws, but as a path of return to God. This entails reviving the disciplines that elevate the soul—prayer, contemplation, charity—not as cultural artifacts or identity markers, but as means of embodying an Islamic consciousness. It requires a reintegration of theology, spirituality, and ethics around a shared understanding of man’s purpose—to know, worship, and draw near to the Creator. Indeed, only when this internal architecture is restored will Muslims be able to speak meaningfully and convincingly to the crises of modernity.

​

The proposition facing Muslims today, then, is not to modernize Islam, but to retrieve its fullness. This does not mean resisting change for its own sake, nor retreating into nostalgia. It means distinguishing between what must be translated and what must be preserved—between what is peripheral and what is foundational. At its core, Islam is not a philosophical theory nor a political movement, but a covenant between man and God. To reduce it to anything less is to diminish its capacity to effect genuine spiritual and civilizational renewal.