“Have they not travelled throughout the land so their hearts may reason, and their ears may listen? Indeed, it is not the eyes that are blind, but it is the hearts in the chests that grow blind.” (Quran 22:46)

 

In many contemporary societies, the notion of faith is often depicted as a mere relic of fervent religiosity, seemingly at odds with the principles of modern science and rational thought. Indeed, in today’s world, faith-based perspectives are seldom afforded serious consideration and are frequently characterized as primitive and impractical in an age that prioritizes empirical evidence and reason. That said, this view fails to recognize that faith is not simply a remnant of some bygone era but rather a foundational aspect of the human experience, shaping how individuals attempt to understand a world that remains, in many ways, unknowable on the basis of reason alone.  ​

​

​Even within the domains of logic and mathematics—fields revered for their rational rigor—there is an implicit acknowledgment of the limits of human understanding. Kurt Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem, for instance, demonstrates that within any sufficiently complex logical system, there exist truths (axioms) that cannot be proven using the system’s own rules. For example, the notion that “a straight line can be drawn between any two points” is not derived but instead accepted as self-evident within the framework of Euclidian geometry. And while an axiom might be justified within another framework—such as analytic geometry—Gödel’s work proves that no ultimate, self-sufficient system can exist, as each new framework inevitably introduces its own unprovable assumptions.

​

Thus, in its broadest sense, Gödel’s insight alludes to an essential truth, namely, that rational inquiry itself, like individual logical systems, rests upon certain unverifiable presuppositions. Indeed, the integrity of logical proofs, mathematical reasoning, and even scientific principles requires one to trust or, in other words, place one's faith in assumptions that cannot be validated through reason but are instead simply taken to be true. One such assumption is the reliability of human cognition. It is generally taken for granted that the mind perceives reality with accuracy, yet this belief cannot be verified without relying on the very cognitive faculties under scrutiny. If reason were inherently flawed, any attempt to confirm its validity would be circular, leaving the entire foundation of knowledge vulnerable to doubt.

 

Likewise, even the fundamental laws of logic, which serve as the scaffolding of rational thought, must be accepted as axiomatic. The law of non-contradiction, for instance, asserts that a proposition cannot be both true and false simultaneously. Yet, any effort to validate this principle must assume its own truth, resulting in an unavoidable epistemic loop. Moreover, equally fundamental, yet often overlooked, is the assumption that objective truth exists at all. Indeed, to engage in any form of inquiry, one must presuppose that truth is not merely a construct of perception but an independent reality that can, at least in principle, be discovered. Without this conviction, the pursuit of knowledge would be rendered meaningless, as there would be no distinction between truth and illusion.

​

To dismiss the idea of faith, then, is to misunderstand its role in shaping human thought. It is not an antithesis to reason, nor is it confined only to the realm of organized religion. Rather, faith is the necessary foundation upon which all reasoning, knowledge, and meaning rest. Therefore, instead of being viewed as some outdated notion, faith ought to be recognized as an indispensable element of the human experience—one that enables man to engage with a world that will always, in some measure, surpass our ability to fully comprehend it through reason alone.​​​​​​​

​

​​​

​​